|
The Mental Health Review Board was established under Part
6 of the Mental Health Act 1996 (the "Act"). The
objects of the Act are:
(a) ensuring that persons having a mental illness receive
the best care and treatment with the least restriction of their freedom
and the least interference of their rights and dignity;
(b) ensuring the proper protection of patients as well
as the public; and
(c) minimising the adverse effects of mental illness on
family life.
The role of the Mental Health Review Board ("the Board")
is critical in ensuring the objects of the Act are met. The
Board provides involuntary patients, whether detained in an
authorised hospital or subject to a Community Treatment Order
in the community with a speedy, informal and fair means of
having their involuntary status reviewed, either upon request
or periodically.
The establishment of the Board under the Act also embodies
Principle 17 of the United Nations document 'Principles for
the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the
Improvement of Mental Health Care' (1991). Principle 17 requires
that involuntary detention be reviewed at reasonable intervals
by a body that is judicial or otherwise independent, assisted
by qualified mental health practitioners. The United Nations
principle also requires that the review body's procedures
be simple and expeditious and that there be a right of appeal
to a higher court against a decision.
There were a number of reasons behind the decision to publish
Handbook 2000, the Board's inaugural policy handbook. The
goals of the original Handbook included:
- articulating the way in which the Board goes about its
task of reviewing
the involuntary status of patients; and
- being open and accountable to the Board's 'client base',
which includes mental health consumers, carers, service
providers, advocacy groups, non-government
organisations, the Health Department, the Minister, and
the general community.
Feedback has been received from various sources since publication
and in early 2001 further feedback was sought from interested
persons and groups. I thank all persons who took the time
to provide feedback to the Board. This revised edition of
the Handbook takes account, where possible, of the feedback
received and is intended to provide a clear guide to how the
Board seeks to meet the responsibilities given to it by the
Act.
In an area as dynamic and complex as mental health, new situations
will inevitably emerge which will require new responses. I
therefore request feedback in relation to matters in this
Handbook or those matters that observers consider should be
included in the Handbook but have not been. The feedback will
be considered for inclusion in future editions of the Handbook,
which will be published as the need arises.

Neville Barber
PRESIDENT
»
Next Page: Table of Contents
|